[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [bt-spec] Issue 15 - Negative reply to BEGIN
Hi
Mark,
I
guess that the spec is not very heavy at present on error reporting - it takes a
relatively light, but probably adequate, touch. I think that what you are
highlighting is actually a problem when you have more than one BTP message
travelling together - which one does a FAULT message in reply refer to? I
suppose one could use a qualifier on FAULT to point to the message / parameter
that caused the problem.
With
regards to BEGIN, would you like to propose some text for us to
consider?
Best Regards
Tony
A M Fletcher
Choreology Ltd., 13 Austin Friars, London
EC2N 2JX UK
Tel: +44 (0) 20
76701787 Mobile: +44 (0) 7801
948219
tony.fletcher@choreology.com
(Home: amfletcher@iee.org)
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Little [mailto:mark_little@hp.com] Sent: 24 January 2002 15:57 To: Tony Fletcher; BT - spec Subject: Re: [bt-spec] Issue 15 - Negative reply to BEGIN
This
still doesn't make it clear for BEGIN that an associated context may well be the
cause of the Fault. Can we not be even more explicit in the actual description
of the BEGIN?
Mark.
----------------------------------------------
Dr. Mark Little, Distinguished Engineer, Transactions Architect, HP Arjuna Labs Email: mark_little@hp.com Phone: +44 191 2606216 Fax : +44 191 2606250 |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC