bt-spec message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Elist Home]
Subject: [bt-spec] Additions to the conformance section
- From: Tony Fletcher <tony.fletcher@choreology.com>
- To: BT - spec <bt-spec@lists.oasis-open.org>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 17:04:38 +0000
Dear
Bill,
I have had a look
through the 'Conformance Requirements for Specifications' V 0.4 (14 Jan 02) plus
some of the suggestions in previous messages. I would like to suggest some
additions to our present Conformance section. I suggest we retain the
current text and add at the current end of that section. I wonder what you
and the rest of the BTP spec team think. Please let me know whether you
feel these additions are worthwhile or not. I do not wish to start a great
debate. If anyone has a strong objection to any statement I propose to
add, then I would propose withdrawing it.
PS I apologise to
you all for calling you Drear in a previous message today - completely
unintended. Being an actual word it slipped through my normally vigilant
spell checker!
Best Regards
Tony
A M Fletcher
Choreology Ltd., 13 Austin Friars, London
EC2N 2JX UK
Tel: +44 (0) 20
76701787 Mobile: +44 (0) 7801
948219
2002-01-24.BTP_Conformance_0.9.1.doc
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC