[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [bt-spec] URI issue subquestion #1
Our answer to the question below is yes too, though its good to be sure that your proposal is not supposed to be reducing this functionality. Peter > -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Little [mailto:mark_little@hp.com] > Sent: 01 February 2002 10:12 > To: Peter Furniss; BT - spec > Cc: Jim Webber > Subject: [bt-spec] URI issue subquestion #1 > > > Rather than continue to go round and round the same loop maybe we should > break this discussion up into individual points. Based on the group's > answers to each we may then find that it simply isn't necessary > to continue, > or vice versa. > > So, on that note, here's the first point: > > Do we think it is necessary to support the migration of entities? > > Our answer is yes and I would assume that that is the committees view too, > but it would be useful to see. > > Next question to follow. > > Mark. > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > SENDER : Dr. Mark Little, Architect (Transactions), HP Arjuna Labs > PHONE : +44 191 206 4538, FAX : +44 191 206 4203 > EMAIL : mark@arjuna.com | mark_little@hp.com > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription > manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl> >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC