[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [bt-spec] URI issue subquestion #2
> I'm assuming the answer to subquestion #1 is yes, so: > > Do we think that entity migration necessitates retaining the same name at > each endpoint address? (For now let's ignore the issues raised by allowing > name change and just concentrate on whether or not, in principle, > this is a > good idea.) > > Our response would be yes. But I thought you were arguing that you wanted to change the name. Now you say you think migration recessitates retaining the same name at each endpoint address. But your parenthesis seems to go the other way. We believe a migrating entity should have a name which is invariant over all its migrations. We believe it is a bad idea to allow an entity to change its name. Peter
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC