Re: [cgmo-webcgm] Review Chapter 2

[Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>]

At 05:53 PM 6/2/2005 +0200, =?us-ascii?Q?Dieter__Weidenbruck?=
wrote:
> here are my comments regarding
> chapter 2 (and typos in 1)

Thanks for your careful reading.  All comments were implemented as
specified, except:

> The colour model sRGB-alpha is
> deprecated and may be removed in a future version of
> WebCGM.

It was my impression that this is not finally confirmed yet, and Benoit
has an action item to discuss his recommendation with Chris Lilley (who
is the source of the requirement and a color guru.)  Therefore I
included the recommended sentence with issue flagging.

> The layer is defined as
> <!ELEMENT layer (grobject | para | grnode |
> gdata)+        >
> also shown in this picture (without the “opt”).

Dave, can you regenerate the picture?  (The EBNF has been fixed
everywhere.)

> 2.6  1.)
> Is there a normative section describing this use case?
(The
wording at #1 is:  "can be used as a scaled down XML
representation of a WebCGM illustration by enumerating the Application
Structures IDs, types and attributes.")

Those are exactly the words preceding example 4.1 in the normative XCF
chapter.

Comments, Benoit or anyone?

To be checked:
Case sensitivity linkuri

-       spelling throughout the spec

check case sensitivity on XML and on CGM side

I will do a careful spell check later.  I'm not sure I understand
the other bits.  I searched ch.2 for linkuri and all occurrences are
correct.  What do you mean by "check case sensitivity on XML
and on CGM side"?  (And who should do that check?)

Thanks,
-Lofton.