[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: re: [cgmo-webcgm] why not use 'data' on <object>?
Lofton,
> All (esp. implementers) --
> I just noticed that everyone passes NUBS01 test, even those without a DOM
> implementation. This is curious, as the CGM is loaded thusly in the HTML
> harness:
> ><body onload="document.getElementById('ivx1').getWebCGMDocument().src= > >'NUBS01.cgm';">
> >...
> ><object id="ivx1" type="image/cgm;Version=4;ProfileId=WebCGM" width="400"
> >height="400">
> Am I missing something, or does this require a DOM implementation to load
> the CGM? Of course, the non-DOM implementations that have "pass" could
> mean that they view the same as the reference picture, when viewing the
> HTML standalone.
Good observation. We had to implement the basic getWebCGMDocument()
interface before we could use the HTML on the Statics to load the CGM.
> But my real question is: why not just use the 'data' attribute on the
> <object> element (per section 3.4 of WebCGM)? Do all implementers handle
> it properly?
We don't support the 'da'ta' attribute.
Or you can use the <OBJECT .... params="src" value="NUBS01.cgm">
to load the CGM in a non-DOM viewer.
> -Lofton.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]