[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [cgmo-webcgm] Highlight test
My opinion: the behaviors should be as you specify, and "yes", in Step 2 C and D should no longer be highlighted. If "highlight" were a Style Property, then that would definitely happen, according to the SP rules in 5.7.5 and the SP inheritance definitions in 5.4. But highlight() is a method, that can be applied to a collection of nodes (instead of just one at a time like setStyleProperty). I have always assumed it behaved like a Style Property, but I can't find where it actually says that in the spec. I would think some pretty bizarre things would happen if highlight() did not inherit like a SP. Does anyone think that highlight() doesn't behave as if it were a SP that is applied to a list of nodes instead of just one node at a time? -Lofton. At 02:25 PM 5/29/2006 -0700, Galt, Stuart A wrote: >Hello, > >Attached is an incomplete test for Picture-highlight but I wanted to get >some comments before it becomes part of the testsuite. > >The CGM chosen for the test has nested objects. A contains B that >contains >C that contains D. > >Step 1: Sets the highlight on B to true. >Step 2: Sets the highlight on C to false. >Step 3: Sets the highlight on A to true. >Step 4: Sets the highlight on A to false. > >In Step 1 I would expect B,C&D to highlight (B contains C and D). >In Step 2 should C and D be no longer highlighted? > >I will make the PNG that goes with the test when I get back to >Seattle next week. I would be interested in hearing what the >results of Step 2 should be. > >Thanks. > >-- >Stuart Galt >SGML Resource Group >stuart.a.galt@boeing.com >(206) 544-3656 >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]