[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [cgmo-webcgm] ISSUE: should the scale() method have a settable origin point
I don't have to implement it but am slightly in favor of including the reference point because if we don't then the normal call to scale will be three calls (or two if the tranform matrix is used) when not scaling around the orgin. -- Stuart Galt SGML Resource Group stuart.a.galt@boeing.com (206) 544-3656 > -----Original Message----- > From: Lofton Henderson [mailto:lofton@rockynet.com] > Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 4:40 PM > To: cgmo-webcgm@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: [cgmo-webcgm] ISSUE: should the scale() method have > a settable origin point > > ISSUE: should the scale() method have a settable origin point > > References: > [1] > http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200901/msg00055.html > [2] > http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200901/msg00063.html > > Discussion: > In threads [1], [2], it was concluded that it is a > convenience, but not really necessary. And SVG omits it as > well. (Which is relevant but not the determinant of this > issue for WebCGM.) Ulrich reports [3], after working on > transform tests, that his team *strongly* supports the > addition of the parameter. > > [3] > http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200902/msg00032.html > > More opinions? Who wants it? Does anyone object? Is there > any technical down side? > > Recommendation: Tentatively, "add scale origin point", > pending further discussion. > ### end ### > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that > generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: > https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgr oups.php > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]