ISSUE Re: [cgmo-webcgm] object/param and errata collection

[Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>]

QUESTION:  Should the 2.1 errata batch contain an informative note 
documenting the IE data/param bug for <object> element?

DISCUSSION:  See archives:
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/201006/msg00000.html
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/201006/msg00015.html
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/201007/msg00002.html

RECOMMENDATION:  As I recall, the TC said 'yes' in a telecon, but I can't 
find it in minutes.

Note.  It could also mention how viewers work around the IE bug (using 
non-standard SRC param and omit the 'data' attribute from the <object> 
elements.)

-Lofton.

At 04:23 PM 8/22/2010 -0600, Lofton Henderson wrote:
>All,
>
>While we cannot use errata to insert into 2.1 a workaround for the IE bug 
>with object/param, on the other hand we discussed an informative note that 
>documents the problem, and what implementations might do about it.
>
>The current errata document [1] doesn't contain such.  Should it?
>
>-Lofton.
>
>[1] 
>http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/39022/webcgm-v2.1-errata-CD01.zip