[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [ciq] Discussion: Levels of addresses
Valid point from David. Ram > -----Original Message----- > From: David RR Webber - XMLGlobal [mailto:Gnosis_@compuserve.com] > Sent: Monday, 29 April 2002 12:48 PM > To: Ram Kumar > Cc: ciq@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: [ciq] Discussion: Levels of addresses > > > Ram, > > Just some clarifications - yes indeed - the vision here is that > CIQ provides the depth to Level 4 - but provides the > subset at the levels 0 - 3 - driven by alignment with the > legacy formats that are aimed at these other levels. > > The goal is to reduce the business overhead (cost) in > adopting CIQ at Levels 0 thru 3, - since adoption of > standards is driven by how well the adoption of them > matches the business needs. > > Thanks, DW. > ==================================================== > Message text written by Ram Kumar > > > CIQ TC > > I had a look at David's PPT material on different addressing levels. > It does make sense to have this different levels. Though in > one picture > it is shown that CIQ falls into level 4, the case is that CIQ > covers level > 0-3 > also as it provides the flexibility to define addresses > at an abstract or detailed level (though it is not explicit). > This is where > we can make CIQ explicit to show different levels which can > make the life > of the users easy in many ways. > < > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription > manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC