[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ciq] Fwd :xNAL URLs
Colin, Let us discuss this when I am over in New Zealand for the next three days. Regards, Ram ----- Original Message ----- From: <colin.wallis@ssc.govt.nz> To: <ciq@lists.oasis-open.org> Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 2:58 PM Subject: [ciq] Fwd :xNAL URLs > Thanks for the copy of the comment Ram. > > I could not exactly replicate his search result (I got a lot of CIQ and > xNAL NZ) but I think it's a point worth considering, if nothing else, for > the marketing and promotional aspect of CIQ. > > There are issues though: > > 1) URLs vs. URNs for persistence. > > 2) the structure and organisation of our document set > > 3) what problem are we trying to solve? The avoidance of using the same > element names in different standards contexts? I don't think that's a > problem. Is it of HUGE value to have each element of Docbook, DITA, xNAL > and everything else searchable so you know the range of uses out there? > Should there be a global OASIS policy about this rather than each TC > approaching it as they wish? > > to name but three.. > > Cheers > > Colin >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]