Re: [ciq] Re: CIQ Specifications & XLink

[Ram Kumar <ram.kumar@oasis-open.org>]

David,
The reason why xlink is now important for CIQ is because of XBRL's
requirement to interoperate with CIQ due to some end user requiements. 
We can have xlink optionally, and
also another simple approach in CIQ that can be used instead of xlink. 
What do
you think? If this sounds fine, what is this other simple approach to 
link resources?
Any suggestions?

Ram

David RR Webber (XML) wrote:
> Ram,
>  
> I concur with Michael on this one.
>  
> The only folks using Xlink that I know are the XBRL - and its almost a 
> deliberate choice there - since then you have to use a XBRL tool that 
> has Xlink support in it - creates a closed marketplace.
>  
> I suggest that we look for other means here.
>  
> The issue with general Xlink support for regular parsers - eg Xerxes 
> - is quite literally - how long is a piece of string?  With an XML 
> document - its finite - and hence has a local memory model.  When you 
> do Xlinks - you do not know what you are Xlinking (in the general 
> case).  Obviously in the case of XBRL its a finite closed world - so 
> that works OK.
>  
> Perhaps we can use includes or imports - or use simple http URL links 
> inside comments - to provide the logical linkage you are after?  Also 
> - we now have the static area:
>  
>  docs.oasis-open.org/ciq
>  
> available to us - so we can reference to content there too - if you 
> need to associate?
>  
> DW
>
>
>     -------- Original Message --------
>     Subject: [ciq] Re: CIQ Specifications & XLink
>     From: "Ram Kumar" <kumar.sydney@gmail.com>
>     Date: Thu, August 10, 2006 10:22 am
>     To: michael.blaim@kremsresearch.at
>     Cc: ciq@lists.oasis-open.org, "Max Voskob"
>     <max.voskob@paradise.net.nz>
>
>     Dear Michael,
>
>     The reason we want to use XLink is that it simplifies providing
>     links between multiple resources (e.g parties) and relationships
>     between the resources that might exist in multiple documents.
>
>     Regards,
>
>     Ram
>
>     On 8/11/06, michael.blaim@kremsresearch.at
>     <michael.blaim@kremsresearch.at> wrote:
>     >
>     > Dear Mr Kumar,
>     >
>     > We are currently working on an XML specification for customer
>     (party)
>     > information for travel and tourism with special focus on data
>     protection and
>     > security. We use xNL, xAL (v3.0) and xCRL (v2.0, but we are
>     looking forward
>     > to v3.0). These specifications really meet our requirements
>     (flexibility,
>     > scalability, granularity etc) so far. The one thing we are not
>     sure of is
>     > the XLink references. Although XLink is ideal for XML references
>     in theory
>     > we can't find a way to put it into practice (with processors,
>     parsers etc).
>     > So what is the reason for CIQ TC to use XLink?
>     >
>     > Best regards
>     > Michael Blaim
>     >
>     > Research Fellow
>     > Tourisms Research Center Krems
>     > Hofrat Erben Str 4
>     > 3500 Krems
>     > Austria
>     > phone: +43 2732 72177 25
>     > fax: +43 2732 72177 21
>     > mail: michael.blaim@kremsresearch.at
>     > web: http://www.kremsresearch.at
>     >
>     > anet - austrian network for e-tourism
>     > http://www.anet-network.at
>     >
>     >
>     > 
>