Re: [ciq] Another potential use of CIQ

["Ram Kumar" <kumar.sydney@gmail.com>]

Very useful thoughts Colin! I will ensure these are catured in the
appropriate docs.

Regards,

Ram

On 6/5/07, Colin.Wallis@ssc.govt.nz <Colin.Wallis@ssc.govt.nz> wrote:
> The following looks to be a perfect candidate for the Intro and Overview
> doc...
>
> > but CIQ really covers various
> > categories of party "master data."  It of course does not cover
> > transactional "customer information" - recent purchases, payment
> > history, etc., but the name might lead people to think it does.
> >
> > With respect to the "Q" in CIQ, [it] is not .... a
> > quality-enhancing process as commonly understood nor akin to a
> > certificate of test results against some objective specification. The
> > CIQ "quality" trio (Valid, InValid, blank) is perhaps better thought
> > of as testimonials to handoff "authorativeness." Again, that Q plays
> into a lot of preconceptions.
>
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ram Kumar [mailto:kumar.sydney@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2007 5:31 AM
> > To: ciq@lists.oasis-open.org; liz.kolster@ssc.govt.nz; Max Voskob;
> > Bruehlmeier,David
> > Subject: [ciq] Another potential use of CIQ
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Just to let you know that the US Patent and Trademark Office is
> > investigating the use of CIQ for international name and address
> > representation.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Ram
> >
> >
>