RE: [ciq] RE: IMPORTANT - Your suggestions please

["Mary McRae" <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org>]

Hi David,

  There is no provision for errata against a Committee Specification; only
against an OASIS Standard. 

Regards,

Mary

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David RR Webber (XML) [mailto:david@drrw.info]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 9:17 AM
> To: kumar.sydney@gmail.com
> Cc: mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org; ciq@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: RE: [ciq] RE: IMPORTANT - Your suggestions please
> 
> Ram,
> 
> What is the issue with xAL errata?  I'm not seeing why this is a big deal -
> its just errata - and therefore relate to the existing xAL.  Just because
> its in the same review package - is not confusing or unclear.  The package
> is xPRL 3.1 + xAL errata needed to support that.
> 
> I'd grab that 15 day review!!!
> 
> DW
> 
> 
> 
> > -------- Original Message --------
> > Subject: [ciq] RE: IMPORTANT - Your suggestions please
> > From: kumar.sydney@gmail.com
> > Date: Tue, March 11, 2008 12:29 am
> > To: ciq@lists.oasis-open.org
> > Cc: mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org
> >
> > Team,
> >
> > If we do option 2, this could be a problem as the namespaces of the
> schemas have to be changed from urn:oasis:names:tc:ciq:xnl:3 to
> urn:oasis:names:tc:ciq:xxx:31. I do not want this to happen as it will
> impact the current implementers of V3.0. This is NOT the IDEAL solution and
> it looks ugly. I also need to change all original v3.0 documents that do
> not discuss xPRL to now discuss about xPRL.
> >
> > The introduction of xPRL should not have any impact on current users
> except xAL schema errata.
> >
> > Releasing xPRL v3.0 on its own looks good except that I do not know how
> to release the xAL v3.0 schema errata. Any release of xAL V3.0 schema
> errata on its own is not possible. It has to go with V3.1 release of the
> original V3.0 specs. If we have had individual specs. for xNL, xAL, xNAL
> and xPIL (like in v2.0), we could have release V3.1 xAL specs. that covers
> the errata.
> >
> > Therefore, I am confused. Not sure how to approach this problem!
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Ram
> > ------------------------------
> > TC Members,
> >
> > OASIS TC Admin have come back to my request for 60 days public review of
> xPRL V3.0. As per TC process, only the following can be done:
> >
> > - Release V3.1 (of November 2007 release) with xAL errata fix for 15 days
> public review
> >
> > or
> >
> > - Package xPRL V3.0 and xAL errata as part of a new version of CIQ
> (Version 3.1 and includes specs. released in Nov. 2007) for 60 days public
> review
> >
> > Please let me know your suggestions. Looks like the later is better.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Ram
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in
> OASIS
> at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php