RE: [ciq] RE: IMPORTANT - Your suggestions please

["Mary McRae" <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org>]

Hi David,

 Unfortunately CIQ isn't an OASIS Standard; it's never reached that status. 

Mary

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David RR Webber (XML) [mailto:david@drrw.info]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 11:18 AM
> To: mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org
> Cc: ciq@lists.oasis-open.org; kumar.sydney@gmail.com
> Subject: RE: [ciq] RE: IMPORTANT - Your suggestions please
> 
> Mary,
> 
> OK - so then we just include a note that this Committee Spec' has
> dependency on an errata to an existing OASIS standard - and that that
> errata will be handled separately as OASIS standard update - but details of
> that are available in {link to kavi zip file}
> 
> Correct?
> 
> DW
> 
> > -------- Original Message --------
> > Subject: RE: [ciq] RE: IMPORTANT - Your suggestions please
> > From: "Mary McRae" <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org>
> > Date: Tue, March 11, 2008 9:30 am
> > To: "'David RR Webber \(XML\)'" <david@drrw.info>,
> > <kumar.sydney@gmail.com>
> > Cc: <ciq@lists.oasis-open.org>
> >
> > Hi David,
> >
> >   There is no provision for errata against a Committee Specification;
> only
> > against an OASIS Standard.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Mary
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: David RR Webber (XML) [mailto:david@drrw.info]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 9:17 AM
> > > To: kumar.sydney@gmail.com
> > > Cc: mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org; ciq@lists.oasis-open.org
> > > Subject: RE: [ciq] RE: IMPORTANT - Your suggestions please
> > >
> > > Ram,
> > >
> > > What is the issue with xAL errata?  I'm not seeing why this is a big
> deal -
> > > its just errata - and therefore relate to the existing xAL.  Just
> because
> > > its in the same review package - is not confusing or unclear.  The
> package
> > > is xPRL 3.1 + xAL errata needed to support that.
> > >
> > > I'd grab that 15 day review!!!
> > >
> > > DW
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > -------- Original Message --------
> > > > Subject: [ciq] RE: IMPORTANT - Your suggestions please
> > > > From: kumar.sydney@gmail.com
> > > > Date: Tue, March 11, 2008 12:29 am
> > > > To: ciq@lists.oasis-open.org
> > > > Cc: mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org
> > > >
> > > > Team,
> > > >
> > > > If we do option 2, this could be a problem as the namespaces of the
> > > schemas have to be changed from urn:oasis:names:tc:ciq:xnl:3 to
> > > urn:oasis:names:tc:ciq:xxx:31. I do not want this to happen as it will
> > > impact the current implementers of V3.0. This is NOT the IDEAL solution
> and
> > > it looks ugly. I also need to change all original v3.0 documents that
> do
> > > not discuss xPRL to now discuss about xPRL.
> > > >
> > > > The introduction of xPRL should not have any impact on current users
> > > except xAL schema errata.
> > > >
> > > > Releasing xPRL v3.0 on its own looks good except that I do not know
> how
> > > to release the xAL v3.0 schema errata. Any release of xAL V3.0 schema
> > > errata on its own is not possible. It has to go with V3.1 release of
> the
> > > original V3.0 specs. If we have had individual specs. for xNL, xAL,
> xNAL
> > > and xPIL (like in v2.0), we could have release V3.1 xAL specs. that
> covers
> > > the errata.
> > > >
> > > > Therefore, I am confused. Not sure how to approach this problem!
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Ram
> > > > ------------------------------
> > > > TC Members,
> > > >
> > > > OASIS TC Admin have come back to my request for 60 days public review
> of
> > > xPRL V3.0. As per TC process, only the following can be done:
> > > >
> > > > - Release V3.1 (of November 2007 release) with xAL errata fix for 15
> days
> > > public review
> > > >
> > > > or
> > > >
> > > > - Package xPRL V3.0 and xAL errata as part of a new version of CIQ
> > > (Version 3.1 and includes specs. released in Nov. 2007) for 60 days
> public
> > > review
> > > >
> > > > Please let me know your suggestions. Looks like the later is better.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Ram
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> > > generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in
> > > OASIS
> > > at:
> > > https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php