[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: xAL review for ISO 19160
cc:Fusaro Randy <randy.j.fusaro@census.gov>
I volunteered to review the OASIS CIQ for the addressing requirements that we identified for the third team. For the review we agreed to answer the questions below about the standard (they are repeated in the attached document). Attached is what I came up with, but I would appreciate if you could review it. I might have missed some things or misunderstood others. Randy Fusaro (CCd in this email) is compiling the reviews of the different standards. Please send your comments to Randy directly (you can CC me but I will be away next week and Randy needs the feedback next week already).
1. Definitive address datasets (reference dataset)
======================================
Is there a reference dataset associated with the standard?
Who is the custodian(s) of the reference dataset?
How do the custodians maintain the reference dataset?
Can you give a measure of completeness of the reference dataset?
2. Quality management
==================
Is quality management addressed in the address standard? Or in a separate standard? Or elsewhere?
Is specific reference made to quality management of address data specifically, or only to (geographic) data in general?
Briefly describe which aspects of quality management are covered.
3. Life cycle
=========
Is the address life cycle covered in the address standard? Or in a separate standard? Or elsewhere?
How is the life cycle defined?
What are the different life cycle stages?
Another option would be to include life cycle in metadata?
Tel: +27 12 420 2547
Fax: +27 12 362 5188
Mobile: +27 82 464 4294
xAL review for ISO 19160 April 2010.doc
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]