[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] Commented: (CMIS-716) Query for v1.1
[ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/CMIS-716?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=25275#action_25275 ]
Alexander Haag commented on CMIS-716:
-------------------------------------
OK implicit cross joins I agree that it will lead to other problems.
The solution based on the objectTypeId, can lead to the problem that if "health insurance" or "pension insurance" has sub types they will be explicitly ignored / filtered out. Only if the client will traverse the objectType-tree and collect every subtype, and provide that in the SQL-IN operator it would be workaround.
Firing two Searches (and doing a kind of UNION operation on client side) would be also a workaround.
From performance view both workarounds are not the optimum.
> Query for v1.1
> --------------
>
> Key: CMIS-716
> URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/CMIS-716
> Project: OASIS Content Management Interoperability Services (CMIS) TC
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Domain Model
> Affects Versions: V1.1
> Reporter: David Choy
>
> Per discussion at the 21 March 2011 TC meeting, this item is created as a forum to collect input on any aspect of the query capability that may need change/extension for v1.1. Depending on the input, the TC will determine the next step.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]