[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [codelist] Dissenting argument on namespace URI
Re: > As an aside, I had a look at the documents in > "http://docs.oasis-open.org/", and couldn't find any TCs that appear to be > using RDDL, so I couldn't get any inspiration from what other TCs are > doing. Good catch, Tony. Thanks. We have an action item identifying the need for an OASIS registry of NS URIs, but it's not yet built. Meantime, some NS URIs that resolve to RDDLs (and indeed, this is what we recommend): RDDLs: http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsmc/200702 http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrm/200702 http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrmp/200608 http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200512 http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wsat/2006/06 http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wsba/2006/06 http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wscoor/2006/03 http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wscoor/2006/06 http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsbpel/2.0/plnktype http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsbpel/2.0/process/abstract Non-OASIS: http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2004/04/sc http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2004/08/eventing http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2004/09/mex http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2004/09/policy http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2004/09/transfer http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2005/02/rm http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2005/04/ssi http://www.opengis.net/gml http://www.w3.org/2000/svg http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing http://www.w3.org/2005/08/ws-polling http://www.w3.org/2005/SMIL21/ -rcc ===================================================================================== On Mon, 16 Apr 2007, Anthony B. Coates (Miley Watts) wrote: > By my reading of the OASIS guidelines (which I didn't find completely > clear), the recommended namespace URI for genericode would be > > http://docs.oasis-open.org/codelist/genericode/ > > However, for practical reasons, I think we need to add the version number, > so that the namespace URI becomes > > http://docs.oasis-open.org/codelist/genericode/1.0/ > > Note that this URI does not contain "/ns/" as Ken's suggested URI does. I > don't see any place "/ns/" in the recommended format. However, I think > the RDDL document for genericode should be located at > > http://docs.oasis-open.org/codelist/genericode/ > > and that all URIs of the form > > http://docs.oasis-open.org/codelist/genericode/M.N/ > > should be redirected to a RDDL document at > > http://docs.oasis-open.org/codelist/genericode/ > > which contains information about all versions of genericode. However, > that doesn't give us anywhere in the URL space to locate the Schemas. > > As an aside, I had a look at the documents in > "http://docs.oasis-open.org/", and couldn't find any TCs that appear to be > using RDDL, so I couldn't get any inspiration from what other TCs are > doing. > > So, in spite of what is suggested in the OASIS docs, I would actually > prefer myself to follow Ken's suggestion of > > http://docs.oasis-open.org/codelist/ns/genericode/1.0/ > > for the genericode 1.0 namespace URI, with this being redirected to a RDDL > document at > > http://docs.oasis-open.org/codelist/ns/genericode/ > > We could then have the Schemas at (I would suggest) > > http://docs.oasis-open.org/codelist/schemas/genericode/1.0/ > > so that there is a consistent structure to the URLs. > > Comments? Do we need to get OASIS to recommend something to us? > > Cheers, Tony. > > On Mon, 16 Apr 2007 16:42:28 +0100, G. Ken Holman > <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com> wrote: > > > It has been brought to my attention that an OASIS policy that states > > "HTTP scheme namespace URIs are to be preferred" is already in place: > > > > http://docs.oasis-open.org/specGuidelines/namingGuidelines/resourceNamingV07.html#NamespaceDesign > > > > I do note that this policy does not allow other files in the directory, > > so we cannot put the schema files in that directory as I had hoped. We > > can perhaps create another directory with these files, say: > > > > http://docs.oasis-open.org/codelist/genericode/1.0/ > > > > I was unaware of these policy issues before writing my comments to Ray > > ... would members please review the policy statements before tomorrow's > > meeting? > > > > Thanks! > > > > . . . . . . . . . Ken > > > > At 2007-04-16 11:14 -0400, I wrote: > >> Given that each committee can have its own repository, I'm suggesting > >> we use something like: > >> > >> http://docs.oasis-open.org/codelist/ns/genericode/1.0/ > >> > >> as the namespace URI with an index.html at that directory in XHTML with > >> RDDL statements, copies of the schema files in that directory as a > >> central resource that anyone can point to, and any other information in > >> support of the base specification. > >> > >> I understand we have polar opposite opinions on this with strong > >> feelings behind both and, as a committee, we have to find a way to move > >> forward. The two suggestions on the table so far to consider are: > >> > >> info:xmlns/oasis/codelist > >> > >> and > >> > >> http://docs.oasis-open.org/codelist/ns/genericode/1.0/ > >> > >> Would other members of the committee please give your opinions and > >> other suggestions for consideration? > > > > > > -- > > World-wide corporate, govt. & user group XML, XSL and UBL training > > RSS feeds: publicly-available developer resources and training > > G. Ken Holman mailto:gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com > > Crane Softwrights Ltd. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/ > > Box 266, Kars, Ontario CANADA K0A-2E0 +1(613)489-0999 (F:-0995) > > Male Cancer Awareness Aug'05 http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/bc > > Legal business disclaimers: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal > > > > > > -- > Anthony B. Coates > Senior Partner > Miley Watts LLP > Experts In Data > +44 (79) 0543 9026 > Data standards participant: ISO 20022 (ISO 15022 XML), ISO 19312, > UN/CEFACT TMG, MDDL, FpML, UBL. > http://www.mileywatts.com/ >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]