Re: [cti-cybox] CybOX 3.0 Roadmap

[Jerome Athias <athiasjerome@gmail.com>]

Sorry in advance, a little bit off-topic. But related.
That just reminded me that i started to work on some diagrams to
represents CybOX objects (and their relationships...) in a 'conceptual
way' (i.e. to highlight what is conceptual, or physical, or what
relates to filesystem, memory, etc.). Just sharing a OmniGraffle first
draft to see if it's something interesting to work on further in a a
collaborative manner.

2015-10-28 20:33 GMT+03:00 Jerome Athias <athiasjerome@gmail.com>:
> I do appreciate the effort  awesome work guys!
> I do like the approach
> I basically agree with all of that
>
> The only thing for now that keeps my brain busy is to figure out, based on
> lessons learned, if one patterning language could cover (all) multiple
> domains. So I would keep that in mind if we go for objects refactoring by
> domain and work on patterning language(s) in parallel
>
> Best regards
>
> On Wednesday, 28 October 2015, Kirillov, Ivan A. <ikirillov@mitre.org>
> wrote:
>>
>> All,
>>
>> Trey and I have put together a page outlining our goals and “roadmap” for
>> CybOX 3.0: http://cyboxproject.github.io/cybox3.0/
>>
>> This is a living document and very much a work in progress, but we plan on
>> using this as the primary resource around topics relating to CybOX 3.0
>> development; eventually, each topic will have its own page. Accordingly,
>> this will be one of the main discussion topics during tomorrow’s meeting,
>> and we'd love to hear your input on it, especially on whether you agree or
>> disagree with our ideas, but also with regards to any other things we may
>> want to do (feel free to bring them up in this thread or during the call!).
>>
>> Regards,
>> Ivan and Trey

Attachment: CybOX_Objects_Win.jpg
Description: JPEG image