RE: [cti-cybox] CybOX 3.0: Address Object Refactoring

["Davidson II, Mark S" <mdavidson@mitre.org>]

I like this form also.

As to representing a host with multiple network interfaces, I wonder if that's a slightly different discussion. In that case, would you have multiple IP address objects with a relationship to e.g., a host object?
-Mark

-----Original Message-----
From: cti-cybox@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:cti-cybox@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of Trey Darley
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015 5:22 AM
To: Terry MacDonald <terry@soltra.com>
Cc: Jordan, Bret <bret.jordan@bluecoat.com>; Kirillov, Ivan A. <ikirillov@mitre.org>; cti-cybox@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [cti-cybox] CybOX 3.0: Address Object Refactoring

On 28.10.2015 22:27:02, Terry MacDonald wrote:
> 
> I probably prefer this one:
> 
> {
>      "ipv4Address": "128.25.213.19",
>      "ipv6Address": "fe80::3e07:54ff:fe6c:6d13"
> }
> 

+1

-- 
Cheers,
Trey
--
Trey Darley
Senior Security Engineer
4DAA 0A88 34BC 27C9 FD2B  A97E D3C6 5C74 0FB7 E430
Soltra | An FS-ISAC & DTCC Company
www.soltra.com
--
"Good, Fast, Cheap: Pick any two (you can't have all three)." --RFC 1925