[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [cti-cybox] Regex for Patterning
The problem with that subset (at least as currently written) is it would not support unicode. I support this, just wanted to point out some material we wrote up for regex in CybOX 2.1: http://cyboxproject.github.io/documentation/regex-support/. The intent was to identify the subset of PCRE that’s compatible across the most common programming languages and frameworks. It or something like it could be included as non-normative text or best practices to encourage people to use more compatible regexes. (Please ignore the note at the bottom about alternative syntaxes, we shouldn’t do that). John From: <cti-cybox@lists.oasis-open.org> on behalf of Jason Keirstead <Jason.Keirstead@ca.ibm.com> Date: Monday, June 13, 2016 at 8:15 PM To: John-Mark Gurney <jmg@newcontext.com> Cc: "cti-cybox@lists.oasis-open.org" <cti-cybox@lists.oasis-open.org> Subject: Re: [cti-cybox] Regex for Patterning Seconded - we need to move forward. Hello, I would like resolve the issue of regex for patterning. Unless anyone voices any objections, we will use PCRE as the regex grammar for the MATCHES operator. Thanks. John-Mark |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]