[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [cti-cybox] Email Object
I have no problem with adopting existing standards but not when it introduces inconsistency with everything else in STIX... everything else is using underscores (_) as delimiter.... Ivan, [Offlist] - Do you support or oppose adoption of this proposed tenet: Adopt RFC names/labels for related CTI TC content wherever practical. If you don't support, can you share the basis for not adopting them (in a paragraph)? I recall discussing this very topic at various points historically, but dont recall the outcomes. Patrick Maroney President Integrated Networking Technologies, Inc. Desk: (856)983-0001 Cell: (609)841-5104 Email: pmaroney@specere.org From: cti-cybox@lists.oasis-open.org <cti-cybox@lists.oasis-open.org> on behalf of Patrick Maroney <Pmaroney@Specere.org> Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2016 7:27:46 AM To: Kirillov, Ivan A.; cti-cybox@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Re: [cti-cybox] Email Object If this is a well whipped horse of the deceased variety (or parrot*), just say “wwhotdv”. No need to elaborate.
(2) Specific Comment: Suggest RFC 5322 “display-name” instead of “display_name”.
Pat |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]