[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [cti-stix] STIX timestamps and ISO 8601:2000
Are there any generally-available tools or technologies that produce timestamps with nanosecond precision today? If we can't identify any I would suggest that we support 6 digits (microseconds) and be done. This is a trivial but important way that we can communicate to the broader community that we are rooted in real-world practice. -----Original Message----- From: cti-stix@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:cti-stix@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of Tony Rutkowski Sent: Monday, November 23, 2015 2:23 PM To: Jordan, Bret; Trey Darley Cc: Jason Keirstead; Jerome Athias; cti-stix@lists.oasis-open.org; Wunder, John A.; Patrick Maroney; Sean D. Barnum Subject: Re: [cti-stix] STIX timestamps and ISO 8601:2000 It's not inconceivable that fractional microsecond values matter in virtualization environments.within the same facility. On a larger scale, the uncertainties associated with the timestamp value will make nanosecond precision moot. Has anyone articulated what the overhead differential is of an expression with a precision of microseconds versus nanoseconds? -t On 2015-11-23 01:08 PM, Jordan, Bret wrote: > I miss typed in my last email, I meant to say micro seconds not > milliseconds, aka 6 digits of precision not 3 digits of precision. > Wireshark and other networking / security tools are able to work with > and provide 6 digits of precision. That is VERY common. What is not > really common today is 9 digits of precision. >
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]