Re: [cti-stix] F2F Topic - Location Object.

[Allan Thomson <athomson@lookingglasscyber.com>]

I agree accuracy/precision should be an optional field.

On 9/16/16, 5:33 AM, "Trey Darley" <trey@kingfisherops.com> wrote:

    On 15.09.2016 15:20:45, Allan Thomson wrote:
    >
    > But I was going to focus on definition what the object will contain
    > as a start and whether its an object that can be an attribute or a
    > related object is a separate discussion.
    >

    I'd like to see a Location SDO that supports an optional precision
    field, along with the ability for third-parties to express their
    confidence on Location precision. That way we can easily support
    crowd-sourcing when there's a high probability someone is way out in
    left field. ;-)

    --
    Cheers,
    Trey
    ++--------------------------------------------------------------------------++
    Kingfisher Operations, sprl
    gpg fingerprint: 85F3 5F54 4A2A B4CD 33C4  5B9B B30D DD6E 62C8 6C1D
    ++--------------------------------------------------------------------------++
    --
    "There are two types of people: those who fit into my taxonomy and
    those who do not." --anonymous