[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [cti-stix] F2F Topic - Location Object.
So long as we do not confuse accuracy with precision. See, e.g., http://fusion.net/story/287592/internet-mapping-glitch-kansas-farm/ > On Sep 16, 2016, at 10:57 AM, Allan Thomson <athomson@lookingglasscyber.com> wrote: > > I agree accuracy/precision should be an optional field. > > On 9/16/16, 5:33 AM, "Trey Darley" <trey@kingfisherops.com> wrote: > > On 15.09.2016 15:20:45, Allan Thomson wrote: >> >> But I was going to focus on definition what the object will contain >> as a start and whether its an object that can be an attribute or a >> related object is a separate discussion. >> > > I'd like to see a Location SDO that supports an optional precision > field, along with the ability for third-parties to express their > confidence on Location precision. That way we can easily support > crowd-sourcing when there's a high probability someone is way out in > left field. ;-) > > -- > Cheers, > Trey > ++--------------------------------------------------------------------------++ > Kingfisher Operations, sprl > gpg fingerprint: 85F3 5F54 4A2A B4CD 33C4 5B9B B30D DD6E 62C8 6C1D > ++--------------------------------------------------------------------------++ > -- > "There are two types of people: those who fit into my taxonomy and > those who do not." --anonymous > >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]