Re: [dita-learningspec] A naming convention for learning contentelements

[John Accardi <John.Accardi@Sun.COM>]

Yes, I like "lc"

John

Reuben Tozman wrote:
>
> How about just using ‘lc’? Even shorter J
>
> Reuben Tozman
>
> Director, edCetra Training
>
> T: 416.530.5890
>
> C: 416.991.5368
>
> F: 416.915.0875
>
> Visit us on the web at www.edcetratraining.com 
> <http://www.edcetratraining.com>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *From:* john_hunt@us.ibm.com [mailto:john_hunt@us.ibm.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, May 10, 2007 10:12 AM
> *To:* dita-learningspec@lists.oasis-open.org
> *Subject:* [dita-learningspec] A naming convention for learning 
> content elements
>
>
> Hi DITA learning SC -
>
> This repeats a 10May agenda item, but I wanted to get wider 
> distribution to the email list, for responses and discussion.
>
> To avoid naming collisions with other DITA elements, including future 
> or private specializations, we might want to consider using a standard 
> prefix for all of our element names.
>
> If so, we need something short and sweet.
>
> For example, how about ltc, for "learning training content" ?
>
> Our element names would end up like:
>
>     * ltcObjectives
>     * ltcIntro
>     * ltcDuration
>     * ltcResources
>
>
> What do you think?
>
> John Hunt
>
>