[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [dita-lightweight-dita] Cancelled mtg today - alternate time this week?
That one was: ACTION: Consider the content models for <li> and <dd> -- make sure they have exactly what the subcommittee really wants I did not capture much discussion about it; the gist is that Bob raised the issue just to be sure that the content models as currently written were "intentional". Carlos and Mark agreed that more thought on them was probably in order. mag From: Kristen James Eberlein [mailto:kris@eberleinconsulting.com] Michael, I don't know whether I will be able to attend the meeting; I'll be at a client site. I suggest that the first thing on the SC agenda be to discuss the content model of <dd>; this is an item that the TC deferred to the subcommittee. Bob Thomas (and others) thought that the content model was overly permissive. (Tom, perhaps you can forward that specific action item to this list?) Original e-mail to the TC: Overall, I am very pleased with the scrutiny that TC members are giving to the Lightweight DITA package. I think we are progressing well. Best, On 6/13/2017 2:32 PM, Michael Priestley wrote:
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]