dita-translation message

Subject: FW: FW: FW: [dita] indexing question

From: "JoAnn Hackos" <joann.hackos@comtech-serv.com>
To: <dita-translation@lists.oasis-open.org>,<cwong@idiominc.com>,<mambrose@sdl.com>,<bhertz@sdl.com>,"Bryan Schnabel" <bryan.s.schnabel@tek.com>,<charles_pau@us.ibm.com>,<christian.lieske@sap.com>,<dpooley@sdl.com>,<dschell@us.ibm.com>,<esrig@lucent.com>,<fsasaki@w3.org>,<rfletcher@sdl.com>,"Howard.Schwartz" <Howard.Schwartz@trados.com>,"Jennifer Linton" <jennifer.linton@comtech-serv.com>,<ishida@w3.org>,<tony.jewtushenko@productinnovator.com>,<KARA@CA.IBM.COM>,<ysavourel@translate.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 06:25:33 -0600

Please note the following resolution of our discussion on indexterm.

JoAnn

JoAnn T. Hackos, PhD
President
Comtech Services, Inc.
710 Kipling Street, Suite 400
Denver CO 80215
303-232-7586
joann.hackos@comtech-serv.com

From: Rodolfo M. Raya [mailto:rmraya@heartsome.net]
Sent: Friday, July 21, 2006 6:53 AM
To: Chris Wong
Cc: Erik Hennum; David Walters; dita@lists.oasis-open.org; Esrig, Bruce (Bruce); JoAnn Hackos; Grosso, Paul
Subject: RE: FW: FW: [dita] indexing question

On Fri, 2006-07-21 at 08:48 -0400, Chris Wong wrote:

From what I understand, the issue of treating indexterm differently in topic prolog vs content was due to the misunderstanding that the content of indexterm in content actually appears as part of that content. Since we have now clarified that indexterm's content is always a subflow, we can treat indexterm uniformly in both topic prolog and content. Is my understanding correct that this issue is now resolved?

Chris

Hi,

To the best of my knowledge, by treating <indexterm> as a subflow element in all cases the issue is now resolved.

Regards,
Rodolfo M. Raya
Heartsome

--
The information in this e-mail is intended strictly for the addressee, without prejudices, as a confidential document. Should it reach you, not being the addressee, it is not to be made accessible to any other unauthorised person or copied, distributed or disclosed to any other third party as this would constitute an unlawful act under certain circumstances, unless prior approval is given for its transmission. The content of this e-mail is solely that of the sender and not necessarily that of Heartsome.