L&T diagrams

["Tom Magliery" <tom.magliery@justsystems.com>]

I'd like to hear (perhaps off-list) from someone intimately familiar with the content and the two diagrams in this portion of the DITA spec:

 

2.8.3 A learning objects approach to learning and training content

http://docs.oasis-open.org/dita/dita/v1.3/csprd01/part3-all-inclusive/archSpec/learningTraining/lc_spec_Overview_assumptions.html

 

I'm working on prettying up the graphics throughout the spec, and I don't know enough about this content to know how much leeway I might have on these two diagrams. My questions are along the lines of: Are any apparent grammatical inconsistencies actually significant terminology? Can any text change without substantively changing the diagram? Are aspects of the layout (such as the shapes and arrangements of objects) significant to someone in this domain of expertise?

 

Thanks,

mag