[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: need help with Passivetex errors
>>>>> "JV" == Janning Vygen <vygen@gmx.de> writes: JV> Thanks very much for your detailed explanations. I gonna take this JV> challenge as soon as i got the time. JV> I tried FOP already and the rendering isnt as nice as i expected. JV> example: the pagenumbering in the table of content doesnt look JV> very nice. JV> What about Passivetex rendering: Are there any /many problems like JV> this? Or can you really generate a printable PDF for real life JV> (which means: it looks very fine) You can get good looking PDFs out of PassiveTeX and think to TOC is better rendered than in Fop. JV> Are there any webpages which compares FOP/PassiveText/XEP (are JV> there any others?) with showing real world pdfs to look at? I wish! ;-) My totally unscientific and anecdotal observation is that PassiveTeX tends to render fonts, spacing and math well (it can do inline LaTeX equations using the right extensions), whereas Fop is somewhat better on tables and graphics. A. -- Alex Lancaster | Free Software Developer: savannah.gnu.org, sourceforge.net
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC