[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [docbook] DocBook Technical Committee Meeting Minutes: 18 Mar 2003
Norman Walsh wrote: [...] > Now there are HTML tables and everyone understands them. The ratio of > CALS users to HTML users must be approaching zero by this point. > > As a consequence, other schemas are now adopting HTML tables instead > of CALS. For example, the IDEAlliance DTD for the XML conferences now > uses HTML instead of CALS. > > If we were starting over, I don't think any convincing argument could > be made for adopting CALS in favor of HTML. > > The question is, should we be flexible and allow HTML tables in > DocBook so that users migrating to DocBook don't have to do any mental > gymnastics to get their tables working? Yes :) Tobi -- http://www.pinkjuice.com/
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]