Re: [docbook] ulink and alternate transformations

[Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>]

On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 09:58:12PM -0800,
 Bob Stayton <bobs@sco.com> wrote 
 a message of 48 lines which said:

> You could use an inlinemediaobject with two textobject
> elements.

Why not <olink>? Their semantics is certainly closer to the original issue.

http://www.sagehill.net/docbookxsl/Olinking.html

[Answer to myself: I find them complicated and difficult to handle,
specially when you have different machines with different versions of
the DocBook toolchain.]