[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [docbook] A bibliographical mark-up question
Hi Nic, DocBook (since version 4.2) supports Dublin Core metadata with elements like biblioid, bibliocoverage, bibliorelation, and bibliosource. I would think bibliorelation would suit your information. See: http://docbook.org/tdg/en/html/bibliorelation.html In the biblioentry for the article, include something like this: <bibliorelation type="ispartof" class="other" otherclass="title">BookName</bibliorelation> This establishes the relationship connecting the article to the book. The stylesheets simply output this element, though, so you might want to customize its template to better express the relationship in the output. Bob Stayton Sagehill Enterprises bobs@sagehill.net ----- Original Message ----- From: "Nic Gibson" <nicg@corbas.net> To: "docbook" <docbook@lists.oasis-open.org> Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 2:27 PM Subject: [docbook] A bibliographical mark-up question Hi all I've been away from DocBook for well over a year now and I've been asked a question that has me slightly stumped. So, I'm going to have to ask the experts :) A client has a book that is being converted into XML using DocBook. The book includes a few entries in the bibliography of the form "ArticleName, in BookName". What would be the best way to mark this up so that ArticleName and BookName are stored in separate elements but that the relationship is represented clearly? cheers nic -- Nic Gibson Director, Corbas Consulting Ltd Editorial and Technical Consultancy and Training http://www.corbas.co.uk, +44 (0)7718 906817 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: docbook-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: docbook-help@lists.oasis-open.org
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]