[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [docbook] Letting components be empty
On 23.7.2011 22:22, Bob Stayton wrote: > db.component.contentmodel = > (db.navigation.components*, > db.toplevel.blocks.or.sections, > db.navigation.components*) | (db.navigation.components)* > > The part before the "|" has to have something, but the part after does > not. Does that relieve the ambiguity? And this could be expressed in > DTD syntax as well, no? I think that this still breaks UPA in XML schema because both groups inside choice start with db.navigation.components. Jirka -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Jirka Kosek e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz http://xmlguru.cz ------------------------------------------------------------------ Professional XML consulting and training services DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing ------------------------------------------------------------------ OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 member ------------------------------------------------------------------
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]