Re: XInclude 1.1 Requirements

[Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>]

Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> writes:
> In the course of trying to work out how best to address transclusion requirements
> for DocBook, some of us concluded that we should try to push this feature further
> up the stack. We've got concrete evidence of progress now:
>
>   http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/NOTE-xinclude-11-requirements-20120214/

It would be very useful to get some review of these requirements.
Naturally, we want to know about any cases where you think the
proposal is inadequate, but in terms of judging interest it would be
valuable to hear just that you read it, care, and think it sounds
good.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>      | Consume less, share more.
http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ | 
Chair, DocBook Technical Committee |

Attachment: pgpCBo95kngQk.pgp
Description: PGP signature