[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [docbook] document reviewing ideas
On 01/02/2014 02:14 PM, David Cramer wrote: > On 01/02/2014 02:57 PM, Mats Wichmann wrote: > .. >> So... asking for advice. What do people typically do when it's time to >> pass a document around to multiple reviewers? I'm not convinced >> something like Word is the best answer even there (you end up having to >> review serially, not in parallel, or you'll go nuts reconciling the >> comments in multiple different docs, but it's certainly comfortably >> familiar to folks whose companies run on MS-Office). Is there a "better >> way" that ties in well with having sources in docbook? > > If you have oXygen licenses for all users, it offers change tracking > features like Microsoft Word's (probably better). > > You could also commit the DocBook source to a github repo and ask for > pull requests. Then you and your users can discuss edits in the context > of the pull request since Github offers threaded comments on each line > and you'll all get notifications when a new comment is added. I can't swing buying licenses (though it's nice to know from a user that the tool works well, maybe someday!) but the git-reviewing-site idea has merit since the source is in git already. though then they have to look at the markup :) thanks! -- mats
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]