[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [dss] Discussion on outstanding issues for the core.
I would suggest that the choice of DTD or schema is a profiling question. I would not expect all implementations to even require to handle this form of signature. Nick > -----Original Message----- > From: Juan Carlos Cruellas Ibarz [mailto:cruellas@ac.upc.es] > Sent: 12 May 2004 12:48 > To: Trevor Perrin; dss@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: RE: [dss] Discussion on outstanding issues for the core. > > > 1. Mmmm I am now thinking of those recommendations whose > structure is defined in XML schema BUT not in DTD. There are, of course > tools not extremely expensive that convert from one to the other... > So, we have to choose between have to face situations where the > server can not offer the service because there is no means for > receiving a XML schema, and in consequence not provide the service > even if it could do that, or make optional the capability of > processing one > of the forms so that we do not preclude developers to incorporate them. > > 2. Yes, network connection... I would say that the service (not > the protocolo) > would be more dependant on the quality of network services, but all this > story is relaying on the assumption that a network connection of a certain > quality is something not so difficult to achieve.... > > Juan Carlos > At 11:18 11/05/2004 -0700, you wrote: > >At 12:47 PM 5/11/2004 +0200, you wrote: > >>A couple of questions, > >> > >>1. I would substitute mentions to DTDs by DTDs or Schemas, > >>just for avoiding questions. > > > >That means servers need to be able to process DTDs or Schemas.. I think > >asking servers to handle DTDs is bad enough, I'd rather not > require them to > >do both. > > > > > >>2 should the DTD (XML schema) being necessarily transmited or > >>could also be possible just incorporate a URI pointing to the place > >>where it is published? I would initially be in favour of allowing both > >>mechanisms. > > > >That requires the server to have a network connection (or have > pre-cached > >the DTD/Schema), or else the protocol fails. > > > >This makes the protocol more fragile. So is it worth adding? > > > > > >Trevor > > > > > >To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of > the OASIS TC), go to > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/dss/members/leave_wor kgroup.php. > To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/dss/members/leave_workgroup.php .
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]