RE: [dss] Discussion on outstanding issues for the core.

["Edward Shallow" <ed.shallow@rogers.com>]

True, but what is the minimum semantic for core ? 

-----Original Message-----
From: Nick Pope [mailto:pope@secstan.com] 
Sent: May 12, 2004 7:23 AM
To: Juan Carlos Cruellas Ibarz; Trevor Perrin; dss@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [dss] Discussion on outstanding issues for the core.

I would suggest that the choice of DTD or schema is a profiling question.  I
would not expect all implementations to even require to handle this form of
signature.

Nick

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Juan Carlos Cruellas Ibarz [mailto:cruellas@ac.upc.es]
> Sent: 12 May 2004 12:48
> To: Trevor Perrin; dss@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: RE: [dss] Discussion on outstanding issues for the core.
>
>
> 1. Mmmm I am now thinking of those recommendations whose structure is 
> defined in XML schema BUT not in DTD. There are, of course tools not 
> extremely expensive that convert from one to the other...
> So, we have to choose between have to face situations where the server 
> can not offer the service because there is no means for receiving a 
> XML schema, and in consequence not provide the service even if it 
> could do that, or make optional the capability of processing one of 
> the forms so that we do not preclude developers to incorporate them.
>
> 2. Yes, network connection... I would say that the service (not the 
> protocolo) would be more dependant on the quality of network services, 
> but all this story is relaying on the assumption that a network 
> connection of a certain quality is something not so difficult to 
> achieve....
>
> Juan Carlos
> At 11:18 11/05/2004 -0700, you wrote:
> >At 12:47 PM 5/11/2004 +0200, you wrote:
> >>A couple of  questions,
> >>
> >>1. I would substitute mentions to DTDs by DTDs or Schemas, just for 
> >>avoiding questions.
> >
> >That means servers need to be able to process DTDs or Schemas..  I 
> >think asking servers to handle DTDs is bad enough, I'd rather not
> require them to
> >do both.
> >
> >
> >>2 should the DTD (XML schema) being necessarily transmited or could 
> >>also be possible just incorporate a URI pointing to the place where 
> >>it is published? I would initially be in favour of allowing both 
> >>mechanisms.
> >
> >That requires the server to have a network connection (or have
> pre-cached
> >the DTD/Schema), or else the protocol fails.
> >
> >This makes the protocol more fragile.  So is it worth adding?
> >
> >
> >Trevor
> >
> >
> >To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster 
> >of
> the OASIS TC), go to
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/dss/members/leave_wor
kgroup.php.
>

To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the
OASIS TC), go to
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/dss/members/leave_workgroup.php
.





To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the
OASIS TC), go to
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/dss/members/leave_workgroup.php
.