RE: [dss] Discussion on outstanding issues for the core.

[Juan Carlos Cruellas Ibarz <cruellas@ac.upc.es>]

It seems that there is consensus on that....Agreed, but then, for 
the sake of completeness we will have to make a profile able to
also manage XML Schemas, otherwise the servers will not be able
to deal with documents whose structure has been defined ONLY by
a XML schema and not a DTD.... do you agree with that?


Juan Carlos.
At 08:12 13/05/2004 +0100, Nick Pope wrote:
>ok just DTD - THE SIMPLEST
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Trevor Perrin [mailto:trevp@trevp.net]
>Sent: 12 May 2004 18:56
>To: Nick Pope; ed.shallow@rogers.com; 'Juan Carlos Cruellas Ibarz';
>dss@lists.oasis-open.org
>Subject: RE: [dss] Discussion on outstanding issues for the core.
>
>
>At 04:20 PM 5/12/2004 +0100, Nick Pope wrote:
>>Ed,
>>
>>I'm not quite clear what is meant by minimal semantic?
>>
>>If I implement the core using a profile with only input document passed by
>>hash none of this is of concern, so I would not need to implement DTD or
>>schema.
>
>True.  But in the case where identifying ID attributes is necessary, I
>think there should be *one* way of doing it.
>
>It's one thing for profiles to be different when they're doing different
>things, but when they're doing the same thing I think we should keep them
>as similar and standardized as possible.
>
>
>
>>In terms of what would be the recommended approach I agree that DTD seems
>>simpler.
>
>Could I just spec DTD in the core, for now?
>
>
>Trevor
>
>
>To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the
>OASIS TC), go to
>http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/dss/members/leave_workgroup.php
>.
>
>
>