RE: [dss] Authentication Token

[Trevor Perrin <trevp@trevp.net>]

This sounds sensible to me too:

<ClaimedIdentity>
   <Name>...</Name> (type saml:NameIdentifier)
   <SupportingInfo>...</SupportingInfo> (type any, optional)
</ClaimedIdentity>

Any objections?

Trevor


At 08:29 PM 10/19/2004 +0100, Nick Pope wrote:
>Seems v sensible.
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Ed Shallow [mailto:ed.shallow@rogers.com]
>Sent: 19 October 2004 20:04
>To: Nick Pope; OASIS DSS TC
>Subject: Re: [dss] Authentication Token
>
>Nick,
>
>     Well put. I like the extensibility of the RequesterIdentity structure 
> (i.e. the SupportingInfo). Perhaps we could add SupportingInfo to 
> ClaimedIdentity. In the EPM profile draft I had reused RequesterIdentity 
> as an OptionalInput.