Re: [dss] JPMorgan/RSA message

[Trevor Perrin <trevp@trevp.net>]

Good point, agreed.

Trevor

At 02:09 PM 10/28/2004 +0200, Juan Carlos Cruellas wrote:
>Trevor,
>If you add the "For example" to the sentence you mention, then I doubt 
>that the
>"Alternatively" adverb in the next sentence has any meaning...I think that 
>it would
>be better something like: "It could also contain....", we are not facing 
>two alternatives
>but enumerating two examples of contents...as it seems that we are no 
>impossign any
>restriction on the contents of <UpdatedSignature>
>
>Juan Carlos.
>
>>At 10:53 AM 10/18/2004 -0400, Glenn.Benson@chase.com wrote:
>>
>>The semantics for <ReturnUpdatedSignature> are meant to be undefined so 
>>that profiles can have it mean whatever they want.
>>
>>The previous sentence to the one you cite says "The <UpdatedSignature> 
>>optional output may contain the original signature with some additional 
>>unsigned signature properties added to it", which allows for 
>>counter-signing of the original signature, as you mention.
>>However, that entire paragraph should be prefaced with "For example, ", 
>>which I'll add in next draft.
>>
>>Trevor
>>
>>To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of 
>>the OASIS TC), go to 
>>http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/dss/members/leave_workgroup.php.
>
>
>To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of 
>the OASIS TC), go to 
>http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/dss/members/leave_workgroup.php.