[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ebsoa] Scope of TC (was SOA and Shared Semantics / EditorsActionItem, et al)
Thanks - but I couldn't find the information I was looking for. Joe David RR Webber wrote: > > Joe, > > Certainly. > > See the materials at : > > http://www.businesscentricmethodology.com > > DW. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com> > To: "'ebSOA'" <ebsoa@lists.oasis-open.org> > Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 1:44 PM > Subject: Re: [ebsoa] Scope of TC (was SOA and Shared Semantics / > EditorsActionItem, et al) > > > David RR Webber wrote: > > > > > > Duane, > > > > > > Such 'best practice' stuff is the domain of the eGov TC - see their > > > document on ebMS recently - and note that the whole premise > > > behind best practice is some domain as a reference set. > > > > > > IMHO ebSOA is a technical specification that provides the > > > mechanisms and components that allow implementers to > > > successfully leverage a broad range of OASIS technologies > > > together as a coherent whole - while delivering on core > > > SOA characteristics (therein is the challenge - figuring that out). > > > > > > That is why I see BCM and EPR as instructive here - as > > > these are actual domains that are attempting to do exactly > > > this - provide people a roadmap to enable them to > > > successfully utilize SOA in a cost-effective and reliable > > > way that delivers the right amount of technology for > > > their business needs. The US Government spent two > > > years and significant manpower developing BCM; > > > > David, do you happen to have any references for this? (US Government and > > BCM) > > > > Thanks, > > Joe > > > > > likewise the Norwegian Government has invested > > > two years of effort in the EPR work. Not to mention > > > the huge effort dedicated to ebXML development > > > to date. > > > > > > Learning from, leveraging and extending these > > > open public specifications is I believe a clear > > > win for ebSOA. > > > > > > DW > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com> > > > To: "'ebSOA'" <ebsoa@lists.oasis-open.org> > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 12:46 PM > > > Subject: Re: [ebsoa] Scope of TC (was SOA and Shared Semantics / > > > EditorsActionItem, et al) > > > > > > > Thank Duane - my comment below that begins with "Very respectfully > > > > disagree. IMHO, the answer should reference mature..." was actually in > > > > reference to the Best Practices document. That is my core concern - > that > > > > we will offer what we term "best practices" that implementors cannot > > > > even implement. At this point, I'm seriously questioning the > connection > > > > of this TC's work to (please pardon my saying this) reality. > > > > > > > > Joe > > > > > > > > Duane Nickull wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Joseph: > > > > > > > > > > The specification itself will not normatively reference other > standards > > > > > (perhaps a non-normative reference as a possible implementation > choice > > > > > is possible). We are at a higher level than any specific concrete > > > > > implementation. We did agree to this. > > > > > > > > > > That is the entire basis for why our TC will also publish a "best > > > > > practices" document. That document will speak to the implementors > at > > > > > the specific time and make such references. > > > > > > > > > > I hope that works for you. > > > > > > > > > > Duane > > > > > > > > > > Chiusano Joseph wrote: > > > > > > > > > > >Duane Nickull wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Chiusano Joseph wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >>>..How well-equipped will we be > > > > > >>>to encourage adoption of our work if it relies so heavily on > shaky > > > > > >>>foundations? > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>[DN] > > > > > >> > > > > > >>We will not rely on shaky foundations. I have made this mistake > > > writing > > > > > >>other architectural standards and advocate we do not repeat them > here. > > > > > >> > > > > > >>Adoption of our standard may not be measured in specific > > > > > >>implementations. A metric may be how people think going forward. > > > When > > > > > >>someone asks the question "What is SOA and how can it benefit my > > > > > >>company?", the answer should be "Pick up and read a copy of the > OASIS > > > eb > > > > > >>SOA Spec". > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >Very respectfully disagree. IMHO, the answer should reference > mature > > > > > >standards that have been widely adopted within industry and > government, > > > > > >and for which there is a more than adequate level of available > vendor > > > > > >products, including some from what one would consider a major > vendor. > > > > > > > > > > > >Joe > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Duane > > > > > >> > > > > > >>-- > > > > > >>Senior Standards Strategist > > > > > >>Adobe Systems, Inc. > > > > > >>http://www.adobe.com > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Senior Standards Strategist > > > > > Adobe Systems, Inc. > > > > > http://www.adobe.com > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Kind Regards, > > > > Joseph Chiusano > > > > Associate > > > > Booz | Allen | Hamilton > > > > > > > > -- > > Kind Regards, > > Joseph Chiusano > > Associate > > Booz | Allen | Hamilton > > -- Kind Regards, Joseph Chiusano Associate Booz | Allen | Hamilton
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]