Re: [ebxml-bp] ebXML Business Processes XML instance document for execution?

["Boonserm \(Serm\) Kulvatunyou" <serm@nist.gov>]

I agree with David. There is a boudry associated with the "executable".

- serm

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David RR Webber" <david@drrw.info>
To: "Sacha Schlegel" <sacha_oasis@schlegel.li>;
<ebxml-bp@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Sunday, November 02, 2003 10:47 AM
Subject: Re: [ebxml-bp] ebXML Business Processes XML instance document for
execution?


> Sacha,
>
> It depends what you mean by "executable".
>
> Take a look at the models and CPA from the AutoTech scenarios for
> GM and Nissan here:  http://drrw.net/visualscripts/#ebXML
>
> There is sufficient information (well almost! some open issues may apply),
> for interchange software (the ebMS engines) plus a pure BPSS engine
> to orchestrate the workflow.
>
> So what's not there?  I'd say transaction assembly (see OASIS CAM work
> for that piece) and integration into backend EAI systems and other
lowlevel
> "linkage" - see BPEL for that level of detail.   An example here would be
> where
> BPSS indicates a process step called "Check stock availability" - this
step
> could
> then be rendered as a BPEL script that talks to the SAP ERP system, +
> the inhouse warehouse RFID tracking system and + the production schedule
> system to predict what the on-hand stock really is and come back to the
BPSS
> with a "succeed/fail" outcome.
>
> Clearly the work of this TC is to better qualify all these details so that
> its
> plug-n-play.
>
> Thanks, DW.
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Sacha Schlegel" <sacha_oasis@schlegel.li>
> To: <ebxml-bp@lists.oasis-open.org>
> Sent: Sunday, November 02, 2003 3:15 AM
> Subject: [ebxml-bp] ebXML Business Processes XML instance document for
> execution?
>
>
> > Hi ebXML BP TC
> >
> > Coming backwards from a CPA (sample Negotiation CPA) to the ebXML
> > Business Process (sample Negotiation Business Process) I thought that
> > the BP XML Instance document should have enough information to be
> > executable.
> >
> > But for some reasons I now think that I misunderstand.
> >
> > Any hints where to catch up on ebXML BPSS, what it is and what it isn't?
> >
> > Kind regards.
> >
> > Sacha Schlegel
> >
> > PS: I admit that I did not read any BPEL (or XLANG, WSFL) or
> > WS-Orchestration specification but the ebXML BPSS 1.0
> > -- 
> > ------------------------------------------------
> > Sacha                                   Schlegel
> > ------------------------------------------------
> > 4 Warwick Str, 6102 St. James, Perth,  Australia
> > sacha@schlegel.li                www.schlegel.li
> > public key:            www.schlegel.li/sacha.gpg
> > ------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>