OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ebxml-bp message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: [Fwd: Re: [ebxml-bp] Late binding summary]


Discussion|oasis.ebBP;
Topic: Late binding summary;
Point: Changes to business transactions or business transaction activities;
abrell@
2 Feb 2004
Is it OK, at some later stage (in the lifetime and use of a specific BPS) to
- Skip BusinessTransactions/BTActivities
- Insert BusinessTransactions/BTActivities

tell@
2 Feb 2004
Thanks Lars, for adding above to the list per our discussion. Its 
something I would like to see in the future. The ability to modify, 
extend by restriction similar to the way Core Components relates to 
BIE.  I certainly would welcome the possibility to define a fully 
defined or complete BPSS for a specific domain and then reduce the 
complexity and requirements for participating parties by removing not 
used BTA. On the feasability side I remember sneing papers on formal 
aspect of inheritance of statemachines. I belive UML 1.5 contains some 
insights into this topic.
@tell

mm1@
adding tags just to keep it going... :>)
@mm1

@abrell


--- Begin Message ---
Lars.Abrell@teliasonera.com wrote:

>Is it OK, at some later stage (in the lifetime and use of a specific BPS) to
>- Skip BusinessTransactions/BTActivities
>- Insert BusinessTransactions/BTActivities
>- Override transition or transition rules
>  
>
Thanks Lars, for adding above to the list per our discussion. Its 
something I would like to see in the future. The ability to modify, 
extend by restriction similar to the way Core Components relates to 
BIE.  I certainly would welcome the possibility to define a fully 
defined or complete BPSS for a specific domain and then reduce the 
complexity and requirements for participating parties by removing not 
used BTA.

On the feasability side I remember sneing papers on formal aspect of 
inheritance of statemachines. I belive UML 1.5 contains some insights 
into this topic.

/anders

-- 
/////////////////////////////////////
/ Business Collaboration Toolsmiths /
/ website: <www.toolsmiths.se>      /
/ email: <anderst@toolsmiths.se>    /
/ phone: +46 8 545 885 87           /
/ mobile: +46 70 546 66 03          /
/////////////////////////////////////



--- End Message ---


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]