[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ebxml-bp] Late binding summary
Lars.Abrell@teliasonera.com wrote: >Is it OK, at some later stage (in the lifetime and use of a specific BPS) to >- Skip BusinessTransactions/BTActivities >- Insert BusinessTransactions/BTActivities >- Override transition or transition rules > > Thanks Lars, for adding above to the list per our discussion. Its something I would like to see in the future. The ability to modify, extend by restriction similar to the way Core Components relates to BIE. I certainly would welcome the possibility to define a fully defined or complete BPSS for a specific domain and then reduce the complexity and requirements for participating parties by removing not used BTA. On the feasability side I remember sneing papers on formal aspect of inheritance of statemachines. I belive UML 1.5 contains some insights into this topic. /anders -- ///////////////////////////////////// / Business Collaboration Toolsmiths / / website: <www.toolsmiths.se> / / email: <anderst@toolsmiths.se> / / phone: +46 8 545 885 87 / / mobile: +46 70 546 66 03 / /////////////////////////////////////
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]