Roberts 2/16/2004: [RSD] #0028 Provide Example Text from CPPA onMapping

["Monica J. Martin" <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM>]

  Discussion|Oasis.ebBP.ebCPPA ebMS mappings;

Topic|ebCPPA version 2.0 texts pertaining to ebBP and supported mappings 
to ebMS

Point|Integrating mappings for ebBP ebCPPA and ebMS into ebBP technical 
specification;

mmer@

Dale,
    I am puzzled by this on three fronts (is that alround?):
    1) we have BPSS with multiple BinaryCollaborations and had always 
assumed the Service was the name of the BinaryConversations and not the 
UUID.  For example the same transaction could be implemented by main BTA 
in multiple BinaryCollabs.  How do you know which one you are addressing?
 
    2) I could not work out from the text of the message below what the 
Action actually pointed to.  If this is the BTA name this would mean 
that the BTA name would have to be unique across all BinaryCollabs 
within a BPSS?  I did not think this was the case.
 
    3) ActionContext is also something that I do not clearly see what in 
the BPSS implements this?
 
 
    In my simple mind the CPP/A needs to point at four things for each 
BPPS:
    1) the ProcessSpecification [uuid]
    2) the BinaryCollab that implements a BusinesTransactionActivity
    3) the BusinessTransactionActivty so you could amend its details TTP
    4) the underlying BusinessTransaction that is used by the BTA so you 
can change its criteria.
    ( of course there is the roles )
 
    The reason for the Four levels is a partner may not implement all of 
the Binary Collabs specified in a BPSS and so you need to be able to 
know which BC they are allowed to use.  3 and 4 are just to enable the 
properties to be amended.  ( I presume the CPP/A allows this? )
 
    For messaging under the control of a BPSS you need the following:
    1) The processSpecification [uuid]
    2) The BinaryCollaboration - that represents a description of the 
conversation that should/could take place
    3) the BTA that is being invoked.
 
    The reason for all three is these are all needed to uniquely 
identify the BTA that is being invoked.  I am concerned that this is not 
currently supported and therefore our BPSS spec would have to make BTA 
names unique across all BinaryCollaborations in a BPSS.  This to me in 
not acceptable as a you may choose to use one BPSS to escribe two very 
similar but different processes where the BTA occurs in more than one BC.
 
/ Martin Roberts /
xml designer,
BT Exact
* e-mail: * martin.me.roberts@bt.com
* tel: * +44(0) 1473 609785   clickdial 
<http://clickdial.bt.co.uk/clickdial?001609785.cld>
* fax: * +44(0) 1473 609834
* Intranet Site : * http://twiki.btlabs.bt.co.uk/twiki

@mmer

mm1@
Just sending with RSD thanks. Monica
@mm1