Re: [ebxml-bp] ebBP 2/3/2005: Minor Update to Descriptive TextMSI-BSIRelationship

["Monica J. Martin" <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM>]

>>Schlegel: Without metadata along the
>>payload the BSI would not be able to associate the payload (imagine
>>encrypted payload) with any ebBP instance it executes or monitors. 
>>    
>>
>Webber: The way I've handled this is to take ANY# receipt of a binary payload
>where the ebMS envelop references the BPSS service/action pair that
>it relates too.  So I guess you could argue that is still metadata about
>the payload - but at least you can just treat the payload as a BLOB and
>not have to worry about inspecting it at the MSI level - just note that it
>was correctly received and then pass to backend application after that.
>
>This is really B2human processing though - not strictly B2B!
>
mm1: Please bring your suggestions to tomorrow's meeting or post 
specific technical specification language as we have this as a potential 
work item for the technical specification draft. David and Sacha, can 
you combine your efforts and propose text? Thanks.