Re: [ebxml-cppa] ebXML CPPA Teleconference Notes May 14 2004

[Martin Sachs <msachs@cyclonecommerce.com>]

Dale,

Regarding why there is only one schema for CPP and CPA, you are the only 
one present who would have been able to recollect fare enough back.

My recollection goes like this:  IBM initially proposed a CPA (tpaML). 
Chris Ferris recognized that expressing the CPA as a composition of two 
parties' profiles (CPP) had lots of benefits. Everyone agreed that a single 
schema for CPP and CPA worked and there was no need for separate schemas.

I believe that the initial decision holds very well. Two schemas provides 
unlimited opportunity for inconsistencies.  We have very few special cases 
caused by the single schema.

Regards,
Marty


At 11:37 AM 5/14/2004, you wrote:
>Hi
>
>Here are notes concerning Friday's teleconference.
>
>Our next teleconference will be May 28.
>
>Thanks
>Dale Moberg
>  <<ebXML CPPA Teleconference Notes May 14 2004.doc>>
>
>To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of 
>the OASIS TC), go to 
>http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ebxml-cppa/members/leave_workgroup.php. 
>

*************************************
Martin Sachs
standards architect
Cyclone Commerce
msachs@cyclonecommerce.com