OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ebxml-cppa message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


Subject: RE: [ebxml-cppa] Re: Notes from BPSS/CPPA conference call


+1.

I think that this would be the cleanest approach.

Best regards

/stefano

» -----Original Message-----
» From: bhaugen [mailto:linkage@interaccess.com]
» Sent: 21 November 2001 18:56
» To: Martin W Sachs; Dale Moberg
» Cc: ebtwg-bps@lists.ebtwg.org; ebxml-cppa@lists.oasis-open.org
» Subject: Re: [ebxml-cppa] Re: Notes from BPSS/CPPA conference call
»
»
»
» Dale Moberg:
» > Suppose 2 companies want to engage in OrderManagement,
» > but do not wish to engage in POCancel actions or
» > POChange actions. [This is not a far-fetched example,
» > by the way.] If the ServiceBinding embraces all actions
» > in the instance, they will in effect agree to bindings
» > for actions that they do not support across the mythical
» > BSI interface.
» >
» > These situations may have the following possible remedies
» > (and I am sure there are others as well!):
» >
» > 1. Create ways to specify a portion
» > of a BPSS instance as the
» > targeted package of leaf actions.
» > That reopens themyriad "name" attributes
» > from which the service name
» > could come from. May be feasible though.
» > 2. Create ways to have Override specify
» > a null binding for
» > actions not agreed to.
» > (Not wild about
» > this one either
» > as it seems to introduce clutter that
» > the binding-up-actions as a group)
» > 3. Apply Tony W's XSLT filter ideas to
» > the BPSS instance to extract
» > the right ones. If we use this technique,
» > then we still
» > should document how the service
» > naming convention works.
» >
» > MWS:  There is one more remedy, which is
» > to create a BPSS instance document that
» > defines only the functions that will be
» > used for a particular interaction. This
» > is probably just a restatement of (3) and
» > is my preference.
»
» BobH: I agree emphatically with Marty.
» Creating different BPSS's for different business
» processes is certainly simpler and safer than
» trying to design, agree on and develop any
» facility for on-the-fly variations.
»
» -Bob Haugen
»
»
»
» ----------------------------------------------------------------
» To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
» manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
»



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


Powered by eList eXpress LLC