Re: RE: [ebxml-iic] test case outcomes: semantics

[Monica Martin <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM>]

> > On above points, I would err on being explicit about the 
> separation as
> much as possible. When we get to ebBP testing, we will have to 
> discuss how
> to represent the QoS constraints usage (for example,
> isIntelligibleCheckRequired). Dale might have more to add (cc: him 
> herein).
> <JD> Just let us know what kind of test condition on the message 
> materialshould 
> verify this.

mm1: Will think about it and advise.